FAQ

Usually yes, and often that is the better call: a logo people already recognise is worth more than a new one nobody has seen. We can tighten it up, rebuild it properly in vector, and put a full identity around it.

Sometimes we will tell you it does not hold. If the logo falls apart at small sizes or only exists as a JPG someone made in 2009, patching it costs more than replacing it. You get that opinion straight, with the reasons.

Two. We show you a direction, you respond, we refine, you respond again, and then it is done. That is enough for almost every project, because the choices that matter get made in the first conversation and not in round five.

If you want to keep going after that, we bill the extra hours at EUR 95. We will always say so before we start, not after.

The logo is yours, in the working files as well as the exports, so any designer can pick it up. No licence back to us and nothing you have to ask permission for.

Fonts are different: a typeface is licensed from whoever made it, not sold. We tell you which licence a font needs and what it costs before we design with it, and we will pick a free one if you would rather not carry a yearly fee.

The design work itself is a few weeks. What decides the actual calendar is your side: how quickly the people who have to agree can sit in the same room and agree.

We plan two feedback moments and we ask you to name up front who signs off. Projects that stall almost never stall on the design.

Both work. A careers section on your existing site is the cheaper route and it inherits everything your domain has already built up in Google. A separate werkenbij site starts at EUR 4,750 and makes sense when the story you tell candidates is genuinely a different story than the one you tell customers.

If you are hiring two people a year, start with a section. If recruitment is a standing job, the separate site earns itself back.

A creative advert starts at EUR 380. That is the concept and the design, delivered in the sizes you need for the channels you are running it on.

The media budget behind it is separate and it goes straight to the platform – we do not take a cut of it. If you want the campaign managed as well, that is advertising on social and it starts at EUR 237.50 per month.

That is the situation it is for. A well-known employer already has a story; you are choosing yours. Being small is usable material – short lines, real influence, the people you would actually work with are visible.

What does not work is claiming to be something you are not. Candidates find out in the first interview and you have burned the vacancy. So we build the campaign on what is true about working there, even the awkward parts.

We write it, from a conversation with the person who manages the role – not from the job description HR already has, because that one is written for the organisation and not for the reader.

You get it back to check on facts: salary, hours, conditions, who the candidate reports to. Tone and structure are ours, the facts are yours.

Both, and you can take just one. Plenty of clients have the creative made here and run it through their own recruiter or media agency.

If we run it, it goes in as advertising on social from EUR 237.50 per month, and we advise at least EUR 10 a day of media behind a vacancy so the platform has something to optimise on.

A brand identity says what you look like anywhere – logo, colour, type, tone. Web design is what happens when that identity has to become a screen someone uses: what goes above the fold, how the navigation behaves on a phone, what a form looks like when it has an error in it.

You need the identity first. Designing a website for a brand that has not been decided means designing it twice.

Yes. You get the key pages as a clickable design you can walk through on your own phone and laptop before a developer touches it. Changing a screen at that point costs an hour; changing it after it is built costs a day.

We do not design every page. We design the templates and the states that are genuinely different, because a design file with sixty near-identical pages in it slows everyone down.

Yes, and it happens regularly. You get the Figma file with the components, the spacing, the type scale and the colour tokens, plus the exported assets – so your team is reading the same values we would have used.

What we cannot do is guarantee the result. Once someone else builds it, how close it lands to the design is their call and not ours. We are happy to review the build and say where it drifts.

Yes. You get a viewer link from the first week, so you can look in whenever you want instead of waiting for a presentation, and you can leave comments straight on the design.

The file stays available to you afterwards. If you move to another agency, they get the file too.

Only if you ask for it, and then it is extra hours at EUR 95. It is not in a standard design project, and we would rather say that than let you assume it is.

What is always in it: we look at your own numbers first. Where people drop out today tells you more about your visitors than five interviews with people who are not your customers.

Yes. A homepage, a set of service pages, a checkout – a redesign of the pages that carry your conversion is often the cheapest way to move a number.

One honest caveat: a new design in an old front-end will only go as far as that front-end lets it. We look at what is under the hood first and tell you whether the design can actually be built there before you commission it.

Design is what we do; printing we arrange through the printer that suits the job, and the print invoice is yours rather than ours with a margin on top.

You can also take the files to your own printer or to the trade show’s own supplier. We will deliver to their specification and check their proof before it goes on press.

Yes. Send us their specification sheet – bleed, colour profile, resolution, whether they want fonts outlined – and that is what you get, in the format they ask for.

We would rather have that sheet before we start than after. Reworking a finished design to another printer’s colour profile is billable hours that nobody enjoys paying for.

Earlier than feels necessary. Design is around eight hours upward, so from about EUR 760, and that part is quick. What is not quick is production: large format, stand elements and anything that has to be built have their own lead times, and a rushed order costs more.

Work backwards from the printer’s deadline, not from the show date, and leave room for one round of proofing. If you are already tight, tell us on day one and we will tell you what is still possible.

That is the normal starting point, and we would rather work from your brand guide than invent something next to it.

One thing that often comes up: an identity designed for screen does not always survive being three metres wide. Thin type disappears, a gradient bands, an RGB colour cannot be printed. We will flag those and propose the print variant rather than quietly shipping something that will look wrong on the floor.

If the file was wrong, that is on us and we fix it. If the print does not match the file that was approved, that is on the printer and you have a claim with them – we will help you make it, because we can read a proof against a delivery.

Which is why we ask you to sign off a proof rather than a PDF on screen. A monitor is backlit and paper is not, and colour on a screen is not a promise anyone can keep.

Websites start at EUR 4,500. Most SME projects land between EUR 6,000 and EUR 9,000, and bigger ones between EUR 10,000 and EUR 15,000.

Three things move it: how many genuinely different page templates you need, whether the site has to talk to another system, and how much of the content still has to be written. Design hours are rarely the difference. A ten-page site with one template is cheap; a five-page site that has to pull live data is not.

WordPress is the content management system behind more than 40% of the web. We use it as a foundation, not as a template: you edit your own pages, and underneath sits an architecture built to your requirements that can talk to your other systems.

Because it is open source, the platform is yours. You can take it anywhere, with or without us.

Most projects go live within three to eight weeks, depending on how much has to be built and how quickly the content is ready.

The roadmap puts a date on it before we start, and at every step you can see where we are against it.

Yes. Every page is built out of blocks you edit yourself, and you get a walkthrough at handover. What you would rather leave to us, we keep doing.

Often, yes. We run a technical audit first: security, speed, structure, and whether the build can carry what you want to do next.

If it can, we take it into maintenance as it is. If it cannot, you get a straight answer about what needs fixing before that makes sense.

No, and you should be suspicious of anyone who says they are. The build is a one-off. Hosting and maintenance are monthly, because they are monthly work.

Support for a website starts at EUR 39 per month, which buys half an hour: updates, backups, keeping an eye on things, and small changes. If you would rather host it elsewhere, that is fine – the site is standard WordPress and it moves.

Webshops start at EUR 7,500 and most land between EUR 12,000 and EUR 17,000, against EUR 4,500 and up for a website.

The difference is not design. It is everything that has to be right before you can take money: product structure and variants, shipping rules per country, tax, payment, the emails after an order, the return flow, and almost always a link to stock or accounting. A website that is wrong is embarrassing. A shop that is wrong costs you orders.

We build WooCommerce, on WordPress. It means the shop is yours, the data sits in your own database, and there is no monthly platform fee or transaction cut on top.

Shopify is a fine product and for some businesses it is the better answer – very high order volume, very little custom logic, a team that wants no technical responsibility at all. If your case reads like that, we will say so rather than build you the wrong shop.

Usually yes. That is a system integration and it starts at EUR 1,700 plus service costs, on top of the shop itself.

What decides it is whether your other system has an API and what it will let us read and write. Before we quote a shop with a link in it, we check that first – because a shop built on the assumption of a link that turns out to be impossible is a very expensive surprise.

You, unless we agree otherwise. Product content is the part clients almost always underestimate: two hundred products is two hundred titles, descriptions, specs and photos.

We give you the structure and a template to fill, and we can write or shoot a set as extra work at EUR 95 an hour. But a shop cannot go live on placeholder content, so this is the item to start on the day you sign, not the week before launch.

Products, customers and order history can be migrated, and we do it on a copy first so you can check the result before anything changes for a customer.

What does not transfer cleanly is anything the old platform kept in its own format – saved carts, loyalty points, subscriptions tied to a payment provider. We list those before we start so you know what has to be rebuilt or accepted as lost.

Support for a webshop starts at one hour a month, so from around EUR 78, and runs up to about EUR 156 for the larger tiers. That covers updates, backups, monitoring and small changes.

On top of that sit your own running costs: hosting, the payment provider’s transaction fees, and whatever your shipping or accounting integrations charge. If you want a guaranteed response time instead of best effort, that is an SLA, from around EUR 312 per month.

A prototype is there to answer one question: does this idea hold up when you click it. It starts at EUR 4,750 – two sprints of 25 hours – and it is not built to survive real users.

An MVP is the smallest version that a real user can actually work in. A full application is the MVP plus everything the MVP deliberately left out: roles, edge cases, reporting, integrations. All three are built in sprints of EUR 2,375, so you decide after each one whether the next is worth it.

You keep it. The code is yours, in a repository you have access to, and the data sits in a database you can export. We hand over the repository, the environment variables and the deployment notes.

What stops is us: hosting, updates and the SLA are services, not a licence. So plan where it will run and who will maintain it before you leave, because an unmaintained Laravel application starts collecting security debt the day nobody is watching it.

Yes, and it is one of the reasons we build in Laravel. It is a mainstream PHP framework with a large market of developers, standard project structure and public documentation – not a house framework only we understand.

We write for the next developer: tests on the parts that matter, migrations in the repository, and README instructions that get someone running locally. If your team wants to take over gradually, we can work alongside them for a few sprints.

Low-code is genuinely faster right up to the point where you need something the platform did not plan for. Then you are negotiating with someone else’s product, and the workaround costs more than the feature would have.

There is also the bill and the exit: low-code is a monthly licence per user that grows with your success, and what you build there rarely moves out. Laravel is a one-off build you own. For a simple internal form, low-code can be the right answer – we will tell you when it is.

Two things, both monthly, both on top of the build. Hosting, sized to what the application actually does. And support: for a web application that starts at two hours a month, so from around EUR 156.

If downtime costs you money, add an SLA from around EUR 312 per month. That buys a response time instead of best effort: 9×5 answers within 48 hours and fixes within a week, 24/7 answers within 4 hours and fixes within 8.

Each sprint of EUR 2,375 is 25 hours and starts with a written list of what goes in it, agreed with you. At the end you get a working version to click through, not a progress report.

What we will not do is promise a fixed price for the whole application up front. On anything genuinely new that price is a guess, and a guess gets padded. Sprints keep the decision with you: after any one of them you can stop, and you own everything built so far.

Then we look for the next best door: a scheduled file drop, a CSV export, a database view, sometimes a webhook that already exists but is not documented. Plenty of integrations run on exactly that and run fine.

If none of it exists, we say so. Scraping a screen or automating a login is technically possible and we do not build it, because it breaks on the supplier’s next release and you carry the risk. That is the point to push your supplier, and we will help you write that request.

The link breaks, sooner or later, because a version you do not control changed underneath it. That is normal and it is why an integration has service costs on top of the EUR 1,700 build – somebody has to be responsible for it after launch.

We build in logging and alerts so we hear about it from the system and not from your customer. Repairing a change on the supplier’s side is work, and we bill it, but you find out before it costs you data.

By deciding one thing at the start: for each field, which system is the truth. Without that answer any integration eventually writes over something it should not have touched.

After that it is technical: a unique key per record so the same order cannot land twice, a queue that retries instead of dropping a failed message, and a log of every transfer so we can prove what went where. We test on a copy of your real data, not on invented records.

We are, for the part we built and for telling you it happened. That is what the service costs on the integration pay for: monitoring, alerts and repair of our side.

We are not responsible for the two systems on either end. If your ERP is down or your supplier changes their API without notice, we will find it, tell you what it is, and fix our side – but the cause sits with them. If a failure costs you money by the hour, put an SLA on it so a response time is agreed instead of assumed.

Often yes, as long as you have the right to access both. What we need from you is an account with the right permissions and, if the supplier requires it, their sign-off.

What we cannot do is give you access you do not have. If a supplier refuses API access or charges for it, that is between you and them and it decides whether the integration is possible at all. We check that before quoting, so you are not paying for a project that cannot finish.

Automation starts at EUR 900. That is one flow between two systems that already have a decent way in – a form that lands in your CRM, an order that becomes a task, a report that mails itself on Monday.

Most projects land around EUR 2,000, and what pushes them there is exceptions: what happens if the field is empty, if the customer already exists, if the invoice is credited. The flow is quick. Deciding what should happen when it goes wrong is the work.

Automation is rules. Given this input, always do that. It is predictable, testable and cheap, and it is the right answer far more often than people expect.

AI is for the part where there is no rule: reading a free-text email, summarising a call, sorting things that do not sort neatly. It gives a probable answer, not a certain one. We use rules wherever a rule exists and AI only where it does not, because a rule you can debug beats a model you can only re-prompt.

That is a real risk and it is the reason we do not put AI in front of a customer without a human in between unless you have explicitly decided to.

How we limit it: the model answers only from your own content instead of from general knowledge, it is instructed to say it does not know rather than guess, and everything it produces is logged so you can read back what was actually said. For anything that carries money or a promise, it drafts and a person sends.

Yes, that is a separate product: AI training for teams, aimed at the people who do the work rather than at management.

It is often the better first spend. A team that knows what these tools are good and bad at finds its own ten small wins, and you only pay us to build the two that need building. We would rather sell you the training than automate a process you are about to change anyway.

No, and we would rather you did not. Automation is at its most useful exactly where the software is staying: it takes the copying between systems off a person without touching either system.

The one thing to check is whether your current tools can be reached at all. If a system has no API and no export, automation around it stays limited, and then replacing it is a real conversation – but that is a decision about the system, not about the automation.

Counted: changes you ask for. New content, a page, a form field, a tweak to a template, help with something in the admin, and any small development work.

Not counted: keeping the thing alive. Updates, backups, monitoring, security patches and fixing something we broke ourselves are part of the subscription and they do not eat your hours. If a request is going to be bigger than what you have, you hear that before we start it, not on the invoice.

Then you get a heads-up first. Extra hours are billed at EUR 95, or we move you up a tier if it turns out to be structural – subscriptions run from EUR 39 per month for half an hour up to around EUR 156.

A one-off busy month is not a reason to change your subscription. If it happens three months in a row, we will tell you the bigger tier is cheaper than what you are paying in extra hours.

Yes, and often. We start with a look under the hood: what state is the code in, which plugins are running, what has not been updated, what is going to bite. You get that read-out before you commit to anything.

Sometimes the honest answer is that maintaining it costs more than rebuilding it, and we will say so even though it is the more expensive advice. What we need from you is full access – hosting, domain, the site – and a name at the old party we can ask questions.

Support is hours: from EUR 39 a month you have someone who knows your site and a budget for changes. What it does not include is a promise about how fast.

An SLA does exactly that, from around EUR 312 per month. Two variants: 9×5, with a response within 48 hours and a fix within a week; 24/7, with a response within 4 hours and a fix within 8. If an hour of downtime costs you real money, take the SLA. If it does not, do not pay for it.

On a support subscription: nobody until the next working day. We would rather tell you that plainly than let you find out during the outage.

Out-of-hours cover is what the 24/7 SLA is for – response within 4 hours, fix within 8, whatever the day. Webshops and applications that earn money outside office hours are the ones that need it; a brochure site almost never does.

From EUR 665 per month, which is seven hours. Most campaigns sit between EUR 665 and EUR 1,300, and that band is a decision about pace rather than about quality.

The hours go into the work that moves rankings: technical fixes, pages and content, and the internal structure around them. You get a monthly report of what was done and what moved. What you do not get is a guaranteed position, because nobody can sell you one.

Search engine optimisation is making sure people find you when they search for what you do. Part of it is technical: structure, speed, clean code. The rest is content that answers the question someone is actually asking.

Done properly it keeps paying off long after the work is finished, which is what separates it from advertising.

Generative Engine Optimization: being found inside AI answers, in ChatGPT, Gemini and Google’s AI overviews, instead of only in the blue links.

More people now ask an assistant rather than a search engine, and those assistants quote their sources. We make sure yours is one of them. We treat it as part of findability, not as an extra invoice.

Findability is built in from the first sprint: structure, speed, and content that answers what your customer searches for. From there we keep measuring and improving.

Usually the problem is not the design. It is a mismatch between what the site says, who it is trying to reach, and how findable it is.

We audit what is there and come back with what is actually holding growth back and what to fix first, in order of impact. The Growth Scan is the quickest way to get that answer.

No. The budget for buying placements is inside the monthly amount, so what you see is what it costs. No media invoice arriving separately.

It does mean the two compete: a month with more links in it has fewer hours of content in it. We show you that split before the month starts, and it is your call which way it leans.

Content that is generated and published without a thought, yes. That is exactly why we do not do that.

Every page gets a point of view, checked facts and something the reader can use. That is what search engines reward, whatever tool helped write the first draft.

No. Management starts at EUR 237.50 per month and it stays that whether you spend EUR 300 or EUR 30,000 with Google.

We think a percentage puts the agency on the wrong side of the table: it rewards spending more, and the work of managing a campaign does not scale with the budget anyway. Your media budget goes to Google, not through us.

We advise at least EUR 10 a day. Below that a campaign gets too few clicks to learn anything from, and you end up paying for a month of data that says nothing.

What you actually need depends on what a click costs in your market – in some sectors EUR 10 a day is three clicks. We look that up before you commit, so you know whether your budget can compete before you spend it.

Traffic within a day: that is the difference between advertising and findability. Whether that traffic converts is the question the first weeks are for.

The first period is measuring and cutting – which searches actually bring buyers, which only bring clicks. Expect the campaign to get better rather than to start perfect, and judge it on cost per lead rather than on clicks.

The campaigns stay where they are, in your own Google Ads account, with all their history. We stop managing them; nothing is taken away or switched off behind you.

Be honest with yourself about the consequence though: with advertising the traffic stops when the spend stops. Unlike findability, there is nothing that keeps working afterwards. That is the trade-off between the two, and it is why plenty of clients run both.

Yes, and they answer different questions. Google reaches people already searching for what you sell. Social reaches people who were not looking yet.

Both start at EUR 237.50 per month each. If your budget only stretches to one, start with Google when there is real search volume for your product, and with social when you have to create the demand first. We will tell you which one your market looks like.

Management starts at EUR 237.50 per month, flat. No percentage of your media budget – that goes straight to the platform.

We hold that line on purpose. A percentage fee means your agency earns more by advising you to spend more, and the work of running a campaign is much the same at EUR 500 as at EUR 5,000.

At least EUR 10 a day per campaign. The platforms optimise on data, and below that they never get enough of it to find your audience.

Better to run one campaign properly than three on scraps. If your budget is tight we will cut the number of campaigns, not the daily amount.

It can be, but not as a lead form. People at work do not fill in a form for a EUR 40,000 purchase because they saw an ad between the holiday photos.

Where it does earn its money in B2B: being known before you call, filling a webinar or a download, and reaching a job title you cannot find in Google because they are not searching yet. Judge it on whether the pipeline moved, not on the cost per click.

We can, and it is separate from the management fee – design work at EUR 95 an hour, or a creative advert from EUR 380 if it is a vacancy campaign.

You can also deliver your own; plenty of clients do, and we give you the sizes and specs. One thing we will keep saying: on social the creative decides the result far more than the targeting does. A cheap ad with a big budget behind it stays a cheap ad.

They stay in your own advertising account: campaigns, creative and the audiences built up in it. We work in your account, not in ours, exactly so this is not a conversation.

What stops is the reach. Social advertising has no residual effect – the day the budget stops, the impressions stop. Anything you want to keep should live somewhere you own, which is why we usually push an email list alongside a social campaign.

Around EUR 1,140 for about twelve hours. That covers the strategy for the flow, the writing, the build in your platform, and testing it end to end before it goes anywhere near a customer.

What is not in it is the platform’s own subscription, which you pay directly and which scales with your list size. Ongoing changes afterwards go through support hours at EUR 95.

No. We are a Mailchimp partner, so that is the platform we know deepest, and we also build in ActiveCampaign and Laposta.

If you are on something else, tell us which and we will say honestly whether we can build in it well or whether you would be better served by someone who lives in that tool. Moving platforms for the sake of our convenience is not a reason to move platforms.

A newsletter goes out when you send it, to everyone. Automation goes out when someone does something – signs up, buys, abandons a cart, has not opened anything for six months.

Automation is written once and keeps working; a newsletter is work every month. If you have to pick one, start with the automated flows, because a welcome sequence that runs for a year outperforms twelve newsletters written in a hurry.

We build the parts that are ours to build: consent recorded at sign-up, a working unsubscribe in every mail, and no buying of lists. Your list stays in your own account.

What we are not is your lawyer. Whether your legal basis holds, and whether you have a processing agreement with your email platform, is a check on your side. We will tell you which agreements you need and where they come from – we will not sign off that you are compliant.

We do, in the twelve hours. Writing is most of the work in an email flow: the build takes an afternoon, deciding what the fourth mail should say when someone has not opened the first three takes longer.

You get the texts to check before anything is scheduled. If you would rather write them yourself, that is fine and the project gets shorter – we will still tell you where a mail is not going to land.

Yes, and that is where email stops being generic. Order history, abandoned carts, what someone last looked at, whether they are already a customer – all of it can steer which mail someone gets.

If your shop is WooCommerce, the standard connectors usually cover it. If the data sits in a system that has no ready-made link, it becomes a system integration from EUR 1,700 plus service costs, and we will say so before you count on it.

It depends on what you need. The Hybrid Approach starts at EUR 4,500 and builds on proven building blocks; a Fully Custom project is quoted once we know your goals and what has to connect to what.

Either way you get a fixed project fee agreed before we start, so there is no invoice afterwards that you did not see coming. You pay for the thinking that goes into an hour, not for the hour.

We work with fixed project fees. All terms are set out in the roadmap you sign off on before the first line is written, so you know what lands on the invoice and when.

No hourly surprises afterwards, and nothing billed that you did not approve.

Every project starts with a session about your goals, your market and where growth is stuck today, not with a standard intake form. From there we write a roadmap: what we build, in what order, and what it has to deliver.

You get a decision moment at every step, so there is never a version you see for the first time when it is already finished.

Most agencies deliver a website. We take responsibility for what it has to achieve. Strategy, design, development and marketing sit under one roof, so nothing gets lost between three suppliers who each blame the other two.

We use AI to work faster, not to replace the people doing the thinking. What you end up with is a foundation that keeps working after launch and a team that stays involved.

Yes. We build complete digital platforms, but you can also bring us in for one part: brand strategy, design, a specific integration, or the marketing around a site someone else built.

We would rather do one thing that moves your result than everything at once.

No. We pick projects on ambition rather than industry. We have built for SMEs that want to own their region and for corporates scaling across markets.

What matters is that there is a goal behind the website. The sector we learn.

We work from Eindhoven (HQ) and Rotterdam for the Dutch and Belgian market, and from Atlanta (GA) for the United States.

Most of the work happens remotely, so where you are based is rarely the deciding factor. Sitting down together is always an option.

Eindhoven and Rotterdam are open on weekdays from 08:00 to 18:00 (CET). Atlanta runs from 06:00 to 14:00 (GMT-4).

For business-critical problems outside those hours there is always someone reachable.

Your platform runs on WordPress, an open-source foundation you own outright, so you are never locked into one supplier.

Inside JKC no project depends on one person: the work is documented and shared across the team in Eindhoven, Rotterdam and Atlanta. If we ever part ways, you leave with everything.

You do. Design, code, and content are yours, including full IP rights. No lock-in on our hosting or our team.

A small senior team of strategists, designers, developers and marketers who have been building digital platforms since 2015.

You work with the people who do the work, not with an account manager who passes your question on.

No. AI helps us research, sketch and iterate faster, but the final work is made and corrected by a person.

Everything is checked on tone, quality and accuracy before it reaches you.

AI can produce something that looks right and is not. So a person always checks the facts, the sources and the code before anything leaves the door.

No. We use tools and settings where your data is not used for training, and we do not feed confidential information into them. Where you need it, we put that in the contract.

Content that is generated and published without a thought, yes. That is exactly why we do not do that.

Every page gets a point of view, checked facts and something the reader can use. That is what search engines reward, whatever tool helped write the first draft.

We tell you. We are open about where AI sits in the process. The direction and the final responsibility are always with our team.

Your project keeps working. We do not build anything we do not understand ourselves, and nothing leans entirely on one tool. AI is our engine, not your foundation.

The time AI saves us on routine work comes off the price. You pay for thinking and judgement, not for manual repetition.

JKC does not hold its own ISO certificate, and we would rather say so than imply otherwise. Our hosting runs with an ISO 27001 certified partner.

For information security we work to the BIO/ISO standards, the same frameworks used by Dutch government bodies and healthcare institutions. Firewall configuration, brute-force protection, malware scanning and encrypted connections are standard on every project we manage.

Yes. Through our affiliate JKC Media LLC in Atlanta we know what the American market asks for, including ADA accessibility and state privacy law.

We build platforms that hold up legally and technically on both sides of the ocean, whether you are a US company growing online or a European one entering the US market.

No. Client data stays where it belongs. JKC Media LLC only has access to projects in the American market, and JKC Media BV only to projects in the European market.

Nothing moves between the two without your explicit permission. We work to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework and stay GDPR compliant throughout.

European client data is stored and processed exclusively on secure servers inside the European Union, fully under the GDPR. American client data stays with JKC Media LLC.

Both entities operate independently and answer to the privacy law of their own market, following the standards of the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework.

A first screening after your application, then a short call about the role. If that clicks, a video interview to go into your work properly, and a final conversation about terms and where you want to grow.

No endless rounds. You hear where you stand.

Partly. On a full-time contract we assume one day a week from home.

The rest of the week we work together at the office, because sparring, reviewing and solving something complicated goes faster in the same room.

We look at what you can do, not at a fixed job description. Because we work on the edge of web technology and AI, there is room to specialise in something few people can do yet.

Take ownership and the role grows with the impact you make.

We work on MacBooks. Development uses VS Code, Cursor, Warp and GitHub; design uses Figma and Adobe Creative Cloud; marketing uses Google Analytics, Search Console, Looker Studio, SE Ranking and Social Pilot.

Everyone works in Google Workspace, Slack and Productive, with Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini alongside.

A small senior team of strategists, designers, developers and marketers who have been building digital platforms since 2015.

You work with the people who do the work, not with an account manager who passes your question on.